Chinese expert consensus on the watch and wait strategy in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment (2024 version)
引用文本:中国直肠癌新辅助治疗后等待观察数据库研究协作组, 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤医师专业委员会, 等. 直肠癌新辅助治疗后等待观察策略中国专家共识 (2024 版)[J/CD]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2024, 16(4):389-400.
作者:中国直肠癌新辅助治疗后等待观察数据库研究协作组,中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组,中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤医师专业委员会,中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会,中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠医师工作组
Authors: Chinese Watch
& Wait Database Research Cooperation Group (CWWD), Chinese Society of Colorectal
Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, Colorectal Cancer Physician Specialty Committee,
Colorectal Cancer Committee, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Colorectal
Surgeon Working Group, Medical Doctor Association
摘要:
近年国内外数据均证实,对新辅助治疗后达到临床完全缓解(cCR)的患者采用等待观察策略,具有很好的安全性和有效性。等待观察及部分患者采取的局部切除可实现患者器官保留,提高生活质量。自《直肠癌新辅助治疗后等待观察策略专家共识(2020 版)》发布以来,在直肠癌治疗领域引起了医务人员和患者的广泛关注。近年来,直肠癌新辅助治疗后cCR 比例进一步提高。虽然等待观察策略相关数据在逐步积累,但实施过程中在终点指标、风险获益、适用人群、评效标准和时机、随访和补救方法以及疗效提高策略等方面,仍存在不同的意见。这与考量的角度、实践经验以及研究证据等有关,将对等待观察策略的稳步推进有所影响。鉴于此,中国直肠癌新辅助治疗后等待观察数据库研究协作组联合中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组、中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤医师专业委员会、中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会和中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠医师工作组及相关专家,在2020 版共识基础上,根据列出的直肠癌等待观察和器官保留实践中的关键问题,通过文献证据、循证医学证据级别和专家意见,讨论更新形成了2024 版共识,为未来此项工作的开展提供思路和借鉴。
关键词: 直肠肿瘤;新辅助治疗;临床完全缓解;病理完全缓解;等待观察策略;局部切除;器官保留
Abstract:
In recent years, domestic and foreign data have demonstrated that the
watch and wait strategy has good safety and efficacy for patients who achieve
clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. Watch and wait
strategy and local resection in selective patients can achieve organ preservation
and improve the quality of life. Since the release of the Expert Consensus
on Watch and Wait Strategy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer
(2020 version), it has attracted widespread attention from medical
professionals and patients in the field of rectal cancer treatment. In recent
years, the proportion of cCR after neoadjuvant therapy has further increased,
and the relevant data of observation strategy has gradually accumulated.
However, there are still different opinions on issues such as outcome parameters,
risks and benefits, eligible population, re-evaluation criteria and timing,
follow-up and salvage methods, and strategies to improve efficacy. Though it
can be explained by the various viewpoints, experiences, and evidences, it
objectively hinders the development of watch and wait strategy. Therefore, the Chinese
Watch and Wait Database Research Collaboration Group (CWWD), together with
Chinese Society of Colorectal Surgery, Chinese Medical Association; Colorectal
Cancer Physician Specialty Committee, Chinese Medical Doctor Association;
Colorectal Cancer Committee, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Colorectal
Surgeon Working Group, Medical Doctor Association and relevant experts has
updated consensus into the 2024 version. This consensus lists the key issues in
the practice of watch and wait for rectal cancer, marks the level of evidence
and expert opinions through literature review and expert opinion, and exposes
the unresolved problems to provide thoughts and solutions for future work in
this area.
Key Words: Rectal neoplasms; Neoadjuvant therapy; Clinical complete response; Pathological complete response; Watch and wait strategy; Local resection; Organ preservation
参考文献:
上一篇:2024年第16卷第4期 目录
下一篇:暂无下一篇
关注我们